✕
HomeFinancing SolutionsPartnersISO ProgramApply NowWhy LogicBroker GuidelinesContactApply Now

MCA Submission Checklist for ISO Partners

Prepare a complete merchant funding file with four bank statements, a signed application, accurate deal notes, and a clear follow-up process.

By Logic Advance · Updated September 15, 2026

A complete file gives underwriting the information needed to begin a meaningful review. It does not guarantee approval or a particular turnaround. Use this checklist to catch avoidable omissions before sending a merchant submission.

1. Confirm Basic Fit Before Collecting the File

Review the current program guidelines. For an MCA, starting requirements include six months in business, $25,000 in monthly revenue, and a 500 credit score guideline. Product requirements differ. Ask about uncertain industries, locations, existing financing, or legal issues before promising eligibility.

2. Prepare the Core Submission

  • Signed application: Confirm required fields, authorizations, business identity, ownership, requested amount, and contact details are complete and consistent.
  • Four recent complete business bank statements: Include every page for each month. Use clear, original statements rather than cropped screenshots or altered records.
  • Existing financing summary: Disclose current providers, balances, payment schedules, and requested payoff information.
  • Brief deal note: State the business activity, funding purpose, timing, revenue pattern, and any issue requiring explanation.

Additional items may include identification, a voided check or account verification, ownership records, processing statements, tax documents, or other records requested by the reviewer. Do not treat every possible item as universally required; ask what is needed for this file.

3. Check Statement Quality and Consistency

  • Do the business name and account details match the application or have a documented explanation?
  • Are all requested months present, readable, and complete?
  • Are transfers, funding proceeds, unusual deposits, and seasonality explained accurately?
  • Are overdrafts, returned payments, and existing funding debits disclosed rather than hidden?
  • Are discrepancies resolved using genuine supporting records?

4. Write a Useful Deal Note

Illustrative note: An established repair business requests working capital for an inventory purchase. The file includes the signed application, four complete statements, and an existing-obligations summary. A seasonal deposit change is explained with supporting records. This example is a format, not a real approval or client result.

Keep the narrative factual. Do not include bank passwords, full identification numbers, or unnecessary personal details. Clearly separate actual revenue from projections and the requested amount from any approved amount.

5. Package and Send Securely

Use readable filenames such as BusinessName_Bank_2026-08.pdf and an organized list of included items. Confirm the approved submission channel and recipient with your Logic Advance contact. Use authorized secure document collection rather than public links or general website messages. Never ask a merchant to send a bank password in an email or deal note.

Maintain the merchant's authorization and a submission log. Coordinate routing so the same file is not submitted repeatedly through different contacts without a clear plan. Keep access limited to people who need the records for the transaction.

6. Complete a Final Handoff Check

  1. Confirm product fit and identify any unresolved question.
  2. Check the signed application and all four statements.
  3. Reconcile business identity and existing-obligation details.
  4. Attach requested supporting records and the concise deal note.
  5. Confirm successful receipt, the file contact, and the next action.
  6. Record follow-ups and supply requested updates promptly.

After Submission

A reviewer may request newer statements, transaction details, or additional verification. Ask exactly what is missing and respond through the approved channel. If a file is declined, clarify whether a correction or changed circumstances would justify a new review. Do not alter records or omit an obligation to pursue a different result.

For related guidance, read how MCA underwriting works, compare direct funder and broker roles, and review the partner program.

Explain Seasonality and Underwriting Terms

Flag the high and low seasons, explain when revenue is normally collected, and provide supporting records requested by the reviewer. Distinguish recurring sales from one-time deposits. A useful explanation supplies context; it does not remove weaker months from the file.

NSF means insufficient funds. Reviewers may examine returned-payment events and days with negative or insufficient balances using different definitions. Ask how the reviewer measures them rather than assuming a universal acceptable count. A holdback commonly refers to the agreed share of sales collected toward an MCA. Scheduled bank debits may operate differently and may require a reconciliation request when revenue changes.

The Five-Minute Final Check That Keeps a File Moving

A complete file is four things: a signed application, four recent complete business bank statements, a summary of existing financing, and a brief deal note. Before any of it leaves your desk, give it five honest minutes. Open every statement and confirm every page is there and readable, then check that the business name, ownership, and account details match the application exactly, line for line, or carry a short written explanation for why they differ and which of the records is the correct one.

Next, read the statements the way a reviewer will. Are transfers, funding proceeds, and one-time deposits explained rather than left to look like revenue? Are overdrafts and existing funding debits disclosed instead of hidden? Is the seasonal pattern flagged with its high and low months? Name the files so anyone can follow them, in the pattern of BusinessName_Bank_2026-08.pdf, attach the concise deal note, and send the package through the approved secure channel to the confirmed recipient, never as a public link.

Merchants remember the broker whose files came back with answers while others were still chasing missing pages. Logic Advance is growing fast and invests in the partner resources that make that possible: current guidelines, a clear checklist, and a team that confirms receipt and names the next step. If your merchants have waited on banks that stalled and brokers who vanished, that search ends here. You found the submission standard that gets files read first, finally.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many bank statements should I submit?

Prepare four recent complete business bank statements with all pages. Additional or updated records may be requested for the specific file.

Does a complete file guarantee approval?

No. Completeness helps the review proceed, but approval depends on underwriting, program eligibility, and verification.

Are an ID and voided check always required at initial submission?

The reviewer may request identification, a voided check, or other verification. Confirm the requirements for the file instead of assuming every possible document is required initially.

Can I send screenshots instead of statements?

Use complete, readable original statements when requested. Cropped screenshots may omit information and delay review. Never edit transactions or balances.

What revenue minimum should I use?

Use $25,000 in monthly business revenue as the starting requirement and check the relevant product guidelines. Meeting a minimum does not guarantee approval.

What should I do about an existing advance?

Disclose current financing, balances, payment frequency, and any requested payoff details. The reviewer needs the full payment burden.

Where should I send sensitive documents?

Confirm the approved secure submission channel with your Logic Advance contact. Do not put financial account numbers, passwords, or identity documents into general website messages.

How long will the review take?

Timing depends on file completeness, verification, program, and complexity. Ask the assigned contact for the next step and a current estimate.

What is the most common reason a submission stalls?

Incomplete statements. Missing pages, cropped screenshots, or a month left out stop a review before it starts, because the reviewer cannot verify revenue from a partial record. Send four recent complete statements with every page included, in clear original form, and most avoidable stalls disappear.

Should I include a statement month where revenue dipped?

Yes. Include all four recent months, including the weaker one, and explain the dip in the deal note with supporting facts. Reviewers expect seasonal and uneven patterns; what damages a file is a gap in the record or a dip discovered without any explanation attached to it.

How should I name the files in a submission package?

Use readable names that identify the business, the document, and the period, such as BusinessName_Bank_2026-08.pdf for an August statement. Add an organized list of everything included. Clear names let the reviewer confirm completeness in seconds and keep your file from being confused with another merchant's records.

What should never appear in a deal note?

Bank passwords, full identification numbers, and unnecessary personal details never belong in a deal note or an email. Keep the note factual: business activity, funding purpose, timing, revenue pattern, and any issue that needs explanation, with actual revenue clearly separated from projections.

What happens right after I submit a complete file?

Confirm receipt, the file contact, and the next action, then record the follow-up in your submission log. A reviewer may request newer statements, transaction details, or additional verification; ask exactly what is missing and respond through the approved channel so the file keeps moving.

Can a declined file ever be reviewed again?

Ask the reviewer whether a correction or changed circumstances would justify a new review, and what specifically would need to be different. Never alter records or omit an obligation to chase a different result; a corrected, honest file is the only kind that earns a second look.

Availability, pricing, approval, and funding timing depend on the program and underwriting. Review your written offer and agreement before accepting financing.